Britney Spears Time Machine

britney_spears-time-machine

It’s amazing that in just 10 years Britney Spears has gone from a sexy, sensual, no talent inbred, mentally weak, ignorant, brainless post-hole, to a not-sexy, not-sensual, no talent inbred, mentally weak, ignorant, brainless post-hole. I suppose the biggest difference though is that now she has that cool watch.

11 Responses to “Britney Spears Time Machine”

  1. cudgel Says:

    Sure there’s all that but there’s something about that gal that rings my bell.

  2. Chris Says:

    Is that really from 1999? Wasn’t she like 16 years old at the time?

  3. Chris Taylor Says:

    She didn’t look like that in 1999; That is from the Vanity Fair cover shoot of Oct. 2003 (when she was 21):

    http://www.gobritney.com/album159/britney-spears-159-4471.html

    But aside from that the main point still stands, kids + crazy can do horrible things to your body.

  4. Megaera Says:

    Amen. See, e.g., Lindsay Lohan. Or better yet, better don’t. She’s even harder on the eyes than Brittany.

  5. Chris Says:

    Meg, Lindsay Lohan is the one that is the real shame. At least everyone knew that Britney was a manufactured poptart that can’t sing very well without voice engineering in the studio.

    Lindsay, when she was sober, had genuine talent and could have been the first Gen-Y actress to carve out a career as a box-office superstar with Oscar potential had she not fallen into the celebrity death spiral. When Rolling Stone put her on their cover under the headline, “Hot, Ready, and Legal!” that was really the beginning of the end. (And yet another reason to use Rolling Stone as piddle papers for the dog)

  6. Chris Taylor Says:

    You’re being generous. I consider the Lohan drain-swirling to be karmic payback for having made “Herbie Fully Loaded”.

  7. The Mayor Says:

    I don’t know, Chris, the death penalty seems more appropriate.

  8. Chris Says:

    “I consider the Lohan drain-swirling to be karmic payback for having made “Herbie Fully Loaded”.”

    I guess Michael Keaton must have hit rock-bottom by then.

  9. Lang Casebeer Says:

    With recent head trimming, intimate videos, wedding breakdowns or just a new pop song release there is a good deal happening close to Britney. You can not help but notice her antics. Lately many people have become a top devotee and can never get too much data or postings about Britney’s appearances. The internet age is her opportunity for money but will it be her ruin with way too much coverage and pressure. In fact I suppose that this blog entry and my few lines are part of the selfsame publicity I commented about.

  10. Ramon Says:

    You must be looking really good, don’t you. You probably think you have an amazing body and you’re smart and you’re perfect. You also think you’re better than other and your opinion is the only one that matters. Does that sound like you, I think it does. No, I’m not here to tell you to “leave Britney alone”; but if you’re going to say something at least learn how to do it. And please get the facts right before you publish something you don’t even know.

  11. Sean Says:

    You should be really sued.
    Since that hot picture is from 2003 & that “newer” picture is after a pregnancy in 2006. State facts don’t be a moron

Leave a Reply

Protected by WP Anti Spam